A Gate at the Stairs: A Novel
In her dazzling new novel—her first in more than a decade—Moore turns her eye on the anxiety and disconnection of post-9/11 America, on the insidiousness of racism, the blind-sidedness of war, and the recklessness thrust on others in the name of love.
As the United States begins gearing up for war in the Middle East, twenty-year-old Tassie Keltjin, the Midwestern daughter of a gentleman hill farmer—his “Keltjin potatoes” are justifiably famous—has come to a university town as a college student, her brain on fire with Chaucer, Sylvia Plath, Simone de Beauvoir.
Between semesters, she takes a job as a part-time nanny.
The family she works for seems both mysterious and glamorous to her, and although Tassie had once found children boring, she comes to care for, and to protect, their newly adopted little girl as her own.
As the year unfolds and she is drawn deeper into each of these lives, her own life back home becomes ever more alien to her: her parents are frailer; her brother, aimless and lost in high school, contemplates joining the military. Tassie finds herself becoming more and more the stranger she felt herself to be, and as life and love unravel dramatically, even shockingly, she is forever changed.
This long-awaited new novel by one of the most heralded writers of the past two decades is lyrical, funny, moving, and devastating; Lorrie Moore’s most ambitious book to date—textured, beguiling, and wise.
Lorrie Moore’s people are jokesters, wisenheimers. They hold the world, and the language used to describe it, a little off to the side, where they can turn it around and, if not figure it out, at least find something funny to say about it, which, often, is not quite enough. It’s been 11 years since her last book, 15 since her last novel, but A Gate at the Stairs is vintage Moore: brittly witty and lurkingly dark, the portrait of a Midwest college town through the eyes of Tassie Keltjin, a student from the country whose mind has been lit up by learning but who spends nearly all this story out of class, as a nanny for a couple who have adopted a toddler. Tassie’s a bit of a toddler herself (and an ideal narrator because of it), testing the world as if through her teeth, and she finds the world stranger and more deeply wounded the more she learns of it. Her investigations make A Gate at the Stairs sad, hilarious, and thrillingly necessary. —Tom Nissley
Barnes and Noble
In a recent talk, Lorrie Moore suggested that 20 is “the universal age of passion”—the point at which the unique shape and expression of our feelings like love and disgust and fury becomes fixed. It is also, she observed, the perceptual halfway point of most people’s existence. Our first two decades seem to pass as slowly as the whole of the rest of our lives, according to scientists, so that our early experiences carry vastly more psychic weight than those of adulthood.
It’s interesting to consider the impact of Moore’s own work by this metric, and not only because A Gate at the Stairs is narrated by a 20-year-old. Since the publication of her first collection, Self-Help, in 1985, so many readers have identified with Moore’s witty, cynical, and yearning failed-relationship stories at a similarly impressionable stage that her writing has become as formative an influence on American fiction as her hero John Updike’s was in an earlier era.
Self-Help, the young depressive’s answer to the dating manual, was my first exposure to Moore. In this debut story collection, which Knopf snapped up when the author was just 26, the characters cheat or are cheated on; they are phoned by married lovers at pointless office jobs; they “make attempts at less restrictive arrangements,” only to “watch them sputter and deflate like balloons.” Reading the book back in college, my friends and I felt as if someone had distilled the essence of our own bad decisions and aimlessness into a terrible and irrefutable prediction that we would spend the rest of our days making the same mistakes we already had, only more so. Moore’s instructional second-person narration and knowing wisecracks leant her prose an aura of authority. Relationships are futile and hazardous no matter which way you go about them, Self-Help seemed to say, but you’re not going to give them up, so you may as well just gird yourself with dread, and soldier on. Subsequent works, which I read in quick succession, induced to a lesser degree the same feeling of witnessing my own future car wreck.
When Moore’s Birds of America appeared in 1998, however, I was thrown. Although precisely observed and often moving, the stories lacked the galvanizing concision of her earlier fiction. The humor was more acutely sardonic than ever, but—especially in “People like That Are the Only People Here,” an astonishing story set in a children’s cancer ward—slowed by a new kind of bitterness and a wrenching, very adult pain that I couldn’t fully access and wasn’t sure I wanted to.
Before reading this long-awaited novel, though, I went back through Moore’s body of work and was amazed to discover that many of the stories in Self-Help now seem tinny and monotonous, and some actually grate. In part this is due to their familiarity; returning to the characters and their predicatments after so many years is like beaming directly into to the mind of my 20-year-old self (The fact that lesser imitators have drained the second person of freshness doesn’t help.) By contrast, Birds of America, Like Life, and Who Will Run the Frog Hospital? revealed themselves as stronger works—deeper and more cohesive in their particular blend of anger, hopelessness, and nostalgia.
A Gate at the Stairs, Moore’s first book in 11 years, is set in a midwestern university community in the months following 9/11. While it engages with familiar themes—deception, boredom, and failure in love; the laziness of youth; the cluelessness of parents—it also represents a significant departure for Moore, both in scope and tone, from what has preceded it. The novel is far more overtly political than her prior fiction, contemplating racism, fundamentalism, war, and liberal hypocrisy.
In the opening pages, Tassie, a college student and small-town farmer’s daughter, revels in the electrifying uselessness of undergraduate study: “My brain was on fire with Chaucer, Sylvia Plath, Simone de Beauvoir. Twice a week a young professor named Thad…stood before a lecture hall of stunned farm kids like me and spoke thrillingly of Henry James’ masturbation of the comma. I was riveted. I had never before seen a man wear jeans with a tie.”
Tassie has already handed in her final papers and plans to spend winter break looking for work. Although she interviews for nanny positions with one “fortyish pregnant woman after another,” there are no call-backs until she meets with Sarah, a restaurateur who coincidentally buys potatoes from Tassie’s father. Tassie is surprised to hear her dad’s rarified produce spoken of approvingly; back home, the locals disdain his small operation, viewing him as a “hobbyist,” a “vaguely contemptuous character, very out-of-town,” even more ridiculous than the despised ginseng growers.
Sarah and her husband are trying to adopt, and she calls that very night to offer Tassie a job. Moore immediately sets up the tensions and affinities between Tassie and her new boss. “[E]ven once she had a baby,” Tassie observes, Sarah “would never be able to shake the Auntie Mame quality from her mothering. There were worse things, I supposed.” The bumper stickers on the back of her car—“PERHAPS YOU WOULD DRIVE BETTER WITH THAT CELL PHONE SHOVED UP YOUR ASS” and “IF GOD SPEAKS THROUGH BURNING BUSHES, LET’S BURN BUSH AND LISTEN TO WHAT GOD SAYS.”—add pointed confirmation.
The first prospective adoptee doesn’t work out, but Sarah eventually manages to get her hands on a toddler, a beautiful, friendly mixed-race child. She renames the little girl Mary-Emma (but calls her Emmie), bakes picture books from the library “to get rid of the germs,” and, to supplement the baby food, arranges to have risotto Fed-Exed home from her restaurant. After a teenager shouts the n-word at Emmie from his speeding car, Sarah starts a Wednesday-night support group for parents of mixed-race children. Tassie overhears their talks from her perch up in the nursery with the kids:
“Racial blindness is a white idea.” This would be Sarah.
“How dare we think of ourselves as a social experiment?”
“How dare we not?”
“I’m in despair.”
"Despair is mistaking a small world for a large one and a large one for a small….
The opinions downstairs were put forth with such emphasis and confidence, it all sounded like an orchestra made up entirely of percussion….
Every time a meeting convenes, the dialogue continues for pages, but the participants are barely, if at all, distinguished.
At its best, Moore’s uncanny dexterity for dipping into the flow of language—for detaching conversations from characters’ back-stories and evoking the realities of how people talk to one another—fosters a sense of universality. After all, people really do misspeak, antagonize, and confuse. They air anxieties and grievances they had meant to suppress and then try to dispel the resulting awkwardness with bad jokes. Yet the profusion of clever repartee in fiction can erode the reader’s sense of the characters as individual people worth investing in. Tassie is strangely jaded and politically informed for a girl with her background, and her rendition of events occasionally suffers from a satirical quality that threatens to undermine the realism and emotional resonance of the book.
When eventually it becomes clear that the adoption is in jeopardy, the plot takes on an urgency reminiscent of a good crime novel. Mysteries pile up: why is Sarah suddenly so dispassionate; who calls the house all day and hangs up; is Tassie’s boyfriend somehow related to the person who drives by at strange times, music blaring? The hollowness of Sarah’s liberalism is expertly exposed, and Moore’s fusion of heartbreak and satire reaches alchemical perfection as the now-bourgie Emmie cries “Ciao, Mama! Ciao, Mama!” from the window of a departing car.
While Tassie’s relationships with Sarah and Emmie are genuine and complex, forming the heart of A Gate at the Stairs, the novel’s many subplots engage less fully and often fail to convince. There is the gorgeous, lying boyfriend whose zealotry, racism, and exit don’t feel supported by what has come before. There is the absent roommate, who is more remarkable missing than when she finally turns up. And there are Tassie’s parents and brother, who seem, until tragedy wrenches them into focus toward the book’s end, to exist largely as background..
For all the evidence supporting Moore’s claims about the shape of our passions at 20, this latest book belies her argument that they become fixed. While deception in love often serves as her early works’ raison d’etre, here it detracts. Tassie’s lover is not sufficiently particularized to hold our attention as a character, and her feelings toward him are too ill-defined for us to empathize with her grief. Through the peripheral story lines and the one-liners, it’s the fate of Emmie that resonates. A Gate at the Stairs is, fundamentally, about the lies people—especially well-meaning ones—tell themselves. —Maud Newton